patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Expanded Gaming Passes, Pit Bull Legislation Dies

Senate adopts gaming bill amended by the House but ends the session without bringing dog bite litigation bill to the floor for a vote.

 

Maryland voters can add expanded gaming to the list of referendum issues they'll be asked to vote on in November.

The Senate early Wednesday morning voted 32-14 to accept a gaming bill amended hours earlier by the House of Delegates.

But a bill meant to overturn a controversial Court of Appeals ruling that declared pit bulls an inherently dangerous dog breed failed after Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller said the House gave senators a "take it or leave it" ultimatum.

"The House said take our amendments or nothing and the two committees weren't able to work out an agreement," said Miller.

The Senate was able to reach a separate peace on the gaming bill where senators quickly agreed to all of the amendments delegates put on the bill Tuesday night.

The biggest of those late amendments was a provision to allow so-called pull tab bingo machines in VFW and other veterans clubs around the state.

House Minority Leader Tony O'Donnell said the provision, which has been routinely rejected by legislators in the past, was the price House Speaker Michael Busch was willing to pay in order to get the 71 votes he needed to pass the bill.

Busch called O'Donnell's comments "an assumption."

Del. Joseph "Sonny" Minnick, a Dundalk Democrat and sponsor of the amendment, denied that there was a quid pro quo and said his amendment was about protecting veterans clubs around the state that are suffering from poor finances due to declining membership.

The House bill also included provisions to provide up to an 8 percent offset to Maryland Live casino and an additional 6 percent in revenues to an as yet unbuilt city casino location.

Voters must approve the expansion of gaming to a sixth location in the area that include both National Harbor and Rosecroft Raceway. A majority of Prince George's County voters are required to vote in favor of a site in their county—something they rejected in 2008.

If approved, a Prince George's County location cannot open before July 1, 2016 or 30 months following the opening of the city location, whichever comes first.

Miller predicted a battle would be waged by opponents and proponents of the Prince George's County site.

"These ads you see about Romney and Barack Obama, they're going to be dwarfed," said Miller. "They're absolutely going to be dwarfed in the Washington media market by MGM and Penn National. It's going to be a television war. It's going to be police involved, the firefighters involved, the school teachers involved. it's going to be hand-to-hand combat. In terms of whether or not the people of Maryland will continue to go to West Virginia or keep the money at home and play these machines."

Related Topics: Bryan Sears, Maryland General Assembly, National Harbor, National Harbor casino, Slots, insider politics, and pit bulls

Concerned Elkridgean

7:03 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Who is going to be the developer?... Cordish???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Urge Tech

11:51 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Hello everyone, it�s my first go to see at this web site, and post is actually fruitful designed for me, keep up posting these content.
http://www.bedbreakfastatlanta.com

Ronald

7:35 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

The Chinese Mob. Now that they left N.J. this is where they want to be (as close to the Nations Capitol as possible).

Reply

Ronald

7:36 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Gambling over pets. Of course.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam R

1:18 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

That Pit Bull Bill stank, It should have laid the ground work for all owners to be responsible for their pets and not single out a breed of dog. What if the law passed and then a German Sheppard tore off some kids face. What would that law have done for the kid???

Clarke Ahlers

8:10 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

These legislators steal from us with impunity. They sell our Constitution to Vegas fat cats. It is impossible to feel anything but contempt for these crooks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike H

8:17 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Uuuuummmmm...Some of us want full table gaming. You may not but when it comes time to vote we will see where the numbers are.

Janet

8:10 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Thanks for the tax increase on the people and I guess we will use that to help all the people with the gambling problems. I don't for one minute believe that this money will go to schools. Perhaps it will go to help all the illegal aliens that the state loves so much....give them their in state tuition.

As for the Pit Bull ban it is cruel to the breed. Not all Pit Bulls are dangerous. Most are very sweet, gentle dogs. I understand that the parents of the boy that was attacked might not believe it but all breeds of dogs have the capacity to attack or bite. You have basically sentenced these animals to death.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mimi Cuff

10:00 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I agree with you completely, especially on the Pit Bull issue.

Comment_arrow

Phil Dirt

12:09 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

All breeds of dogs have the capacity to bite. A few breeds have the capacity to maul and savagely attack. Some people choose to ignore the difference.

Comment_arrow

Bill Howard

10:14 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Pit Bulls do much less harm than MD politicians!

Comment_arrow

Mike H

8:27 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

As for taxing from the gaming, no it will not directly go to teachers, what will go to teachers is the tax dollars from the 4,000 workers salaries.
As for Pit Bulls, I have several friends who have them as pets, they are always nice to me...that said, there is no way in hell I would ever bring one in my house, around my son. Other dogs may bite but the don't have a jaw that locks with a compression rate 5x that of vice grips. What makes this debate all the more irritating are the Pit Bull owners acting like they are the best breed and they are no more dangerous than other dogs, NEWS FLASH- They are more dangerous based on actual noted attacks and more importantly, the severity of those attacks. That said everyone should have the right to own them, but you should also have to deal with stricter laws if you can't control it because it is more dangerous.

Just my $.02

Comment_arrow

HappieGrannie

9:42 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

I agree Janet. I remember when there was a rash of attacks by Rorries, Dobies and German Shepards and no one passed a bill for these attacks they held the OWNERS responsible. This bill sucks on so many levels.

Theresa Defino

8:14 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Mike Miller is missing the point. People will vote against this because they are against bringing more gambling to MD--period. We don't care where it is. And we know from experience this is a bad way to fund education or other seemingly worthy causes--those pots get raided, just like the transportation funds, and Montgomery County always loses, due to our ineffective delegation.

Vote NO!

Reply

Neil B

8:22 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I am all for no gambling. That ship has sailed. We might as well be competitive. I don't think we needed a 6 casino though. Hopefully it never gets built.

Reply

Bart

8:23 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

What a waste of time this session was.
They should have voted for ALL gambling ALL the time, because that's exactly what will happen in the future. It's not a matter of if, but when. Just get it over with, why don't you?
The 2 houses couldn't even put together a bill to overthrow a ridiculous ruling like the Pit Bull ruling. Everybody knew what they should do, but they simply couldn't find the right words. What's so hard about making the laws cover ALL breeds, and take the liability away from landlords?
Folks, this isn't rocket science.
Major Fail.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. Sullivan

9:10 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Exactly right, Bart. And most of these clowns are supposed to be lawyers, who should know how to put together a bill by now.

Neil B

8:27 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I would like to know what all the amendments are. I can't seem to find a good article explaining what was added and for who.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cathy Vitale, Maryland House of Delegates, District 33

9:59 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Neil. I will be putting together a list and posting it on the blog in a day or so when the. Final bill is printed, but here are highlights

Cornish pays 49 to 51 percent instead of 67 percent tax
Prince George county got special directed money for rt 210 and the chance for the state to reimburse, where in AA county, the developer paid

Counties on the shore got enhanced dollars out of the local impact fees
Baltimore city and prince George's county continue to get money from local impact fees off the top before any other county

VFW's and other VET organizations get 5 machines each. Some counties are exempt

I will give a full detailed list later, but that's off the top of my head

Bill Samuel

8:43 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

How do we find out how our legislators voted?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cathy Vitale, Maryland House of Delegates, District 33

10:03 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Go to the general assembly website Mlis.state.md.us type in for special session sb1. In Anne arundel county, the only ones to vote for it were Love (dem, dist32); costa (rep dist 33b) and Frush and Barnes (dems from PG that share dist 21) with AACounty

Comment_arrow

Ronald

5:15 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Hey Cathy. The last time you blogged about the Chief of Police issue you were asked a lot of questions but you failed to respond. How about responding to those before you try to convince us that you are one of the good ones. Don't all your constituents deserve answers?

Bob Hydorn

8:53 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Thank you to the following Montgmery County Delegates that had the GUTS to stand up and vote NO on the gambling legislation.
Charles Barkley
Jim Gilchrist
Arianna Kelly
Susan Lee
...Heather Mizeur
Shane Robinson
Luiz Simmons

Reply

Baltimore Matt

8:56 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

See how this works, the dogs get nothing and the mob gets everything. Folks you should understand who your politicians are really working for.

Reply

Dean Smith

9:04 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

These casinos have not been open an entire half year yet and the PG location has not even begun construction. How does one know they are in need of relief from competition if the competition has not even started?

Reply

Baltimore Matt

9:07 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Isn't it funny that Annapolis can have their sh!t together to pass a bill with shady, mob filled roots, but can't make a seemingly easy bill that addresses pet liability.

Furthermore the casino operator involved with National Harbor has yet to do business in MD. We had a special session, usually a process reserved for unforeseen circumstances (i.e. major disaster, unforeseen required major expense, not successfully passing a budget in January, ect.) for a company that doesn't even have a real presence in MD? This is a sick and twisted abuse of government!

Reply

Double D

9:15 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

If pit bulls could make the state of maryland a nickel O'malley and his cronies would have overturned that bill.

Reply

Baltimore Matt

9:16 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Shame on Conaway, Tarrant, and Robinson for voting for expanded gambling (aka the casino mob). I knew they were ran by the underworld.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Hydorn

9:26 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Please be aware that the Robinson you are speaking of here is not Shane Robinson from District 39 who had the guts to vote NO.

Comment_arrow

Baltimore Matt

9:36 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Bob, the Robinson that I am speaking of is Barabra Robinson of district 40 in Baltimore City who voted yes

M. Sullivan

9:24 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Funny how Pennsylvania had this issue decided and had casinos up and running in a couple of years. They added table games in no time and are now collecting more gambling revenue than Atlantic City. The incompetent, and corrupt bunch of Keystone Cops we have in Annapolis, led by our flip-flopping Panderer-in-Chief, has been screwing around with this for years. The result so far has been a few of the poorest excuses for "casinos" of any state in the Union, placed in the stupidest locations possible. Now, they think they are going to fix things with this latest legislation that is going to further dilute the market while still not addressing most of what's really wrong with Maryland's version of a casino industry.

Reply

Theresa Defino

9:31 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Listen, this is not a done deal. It's on the ballot in November. You don't want MD to be the biggest gambling spot outside of Vegas? That's what we will be, and I am not exaggerating. That's a fact.

VOTE NO.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. Sullivan

9:38 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Even when all 6 casinos are up and running at full capacity it won't come anywhere near being the "biggest gambling spot outside of Vegas". MD casinos are a joke due to the restrictive legislation that set them up and the poor location choices.

Comment_arrow

Theresa Defino

9:43 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

From the Washington Post:
The bill would also allow table games, such as blackjack and roulette, at the state’s approved slots locations — transforming Maryland in a few short years into one of the most concentrated casino markets outside Las Vegas.

Comment_arrow

M. Sullivan

9:53 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Regardless what the Washington Post thinks, I still believe that statement is nonsense. In fact, I would not be surprised if one or more of our first attempts at "casinos" ends up closing.

Comment_arrow

F. Michael Blair

11:03 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

We might want to take a bag lunch into the voting booth (box, whatever) when we vote in November - it may take awhile - what with Gambling, In-state tuition to undocumented folks, redistricting, and, oh yeah, the vote for President. It's gonna be a busy day!

Neil B

9:32 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Don't forget this is all needed because they spend too much money. The only thing we can do is vote them out, and hope the next batch of scoundrels don't get corrupted too quickly.

Reply

Meg Smith

9:43 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

If you don't like it, vote against it. But I am sure everyone on here complaining about it won't actually get up and go vote against the bill.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M. Sullivan

9:50 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Unfortunately, now we will be bombarded with advertising from both sides of the issue for the next 2 and a half months. Somehow these marketing people think that, if they keep bombarding us with the same commercials with mind-numbing repetition, we will do their bidding.

Theresa Defino

9:54 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Do these casinos offer a living wage and healthcare benefits? Or are they just like Walmart, paying slave wages (and locking employees inside) to hard-working employees who end up on the Medicaid rolls, costing the state money while making Walmart billions? So the state is complicit it taking its cut?

Reply
Comment_arrow

HappieGrannie

9:47 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Actually Theresa they pay their empolyees well because they are very selective and want folks who will stay

Donna Macauley

10:05 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I never wanted to move from Maryland....but now I have two more reasons added to my list to get the h*ll out of here. I'm moving as soon as I can. I am beginning to hate this state.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Will

3:26 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

These evil casinos are ruining the state! I'm moving too maybe Nevada

MAW

10:49 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I think we should vote every politician, that voted yes, out of office. This state just sold its soul to the devil. I predict the citizens of Maryland will be subsidizing these casinos within 10 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Edward Charles

11:47 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

This applies to Dear Governor's run for POTUS in 2016.

John Citzen

11:23 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

So are people moving to Vegas for the Schools and the best place to raise a family. No school taxes etc...
IF you believe the goverment is going to help anyone with the exceptions of helping themselves to our money. Your already not playing with a full deck.

Reply

Joan Wood

11:36 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Be very careful when voting on ALL the referendums......our great and wonderful policitians are VERY good and twisting the wording, thus sometimes when you are voting NO you are actually voting YES. I have also learned that the referendum for the "Dream Act" aka giving "In State Tuition to Illegal Immigrants" will now have some wording that links it to the Military......this is a trick they will use to get this passed, because most people will want to help our Military.........be careful and viligant.....if you don't understand the bill......ask someone for help!!

Reply

Edward Charles

11:46 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

My adopted Shar Pei is a lovable, sweet dog. He means more to me than the Vegas Mobsters. In November and next election I won't forget.

Reply

Dean Smith

11:52 am on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Hey Joan!! You are absolutely right when it comes to wording of referendums. When we in the Arundel Mills Mall area tried to clear up last referendum which allowed slots at the mall, the Md. State Election Committee turned us down. There was no mentioned about slots at the mall and the language was confusing to numerous people.

Reply

Sean Tully

12:50 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I am glad the pit bull bill is dying. I know, I know, not all pit bulls are vicious dogs. But there are enough irresponsible owners out there to generate enough reports of pit bull attacks that something has to be done. And, yes, other breeds of dogs bite people too. But those bites generally do not cause such damage that people require reconstructive surgery or even die. There have been some, but when tallied up, pit bulls are the worst offenders.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HappieGrannie

9:52 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Sean That is were the bill should have had some bite the owners. Not just for Pits but ALL breeds. The owners not the landlords should he held fully responsible for their dogs. I have friends that have Pits and children and there are NO issues. It is the owners who train their dogs to be mean that need to be held accountable

Comment_arrow

Sean Tully

10:59 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

I disagree. That's the beauty of the new law. Make the landlords responsible and you will see less pit bulls in rental units. The problem with many rental units in this area (B - City and B - County) are the irresponsible tenants. If the landlords are held accountable, maybe they will keep a closer watch on who they rent to. Some tips for landlords: don't rent to people with dogs. Dogs in the hands of irresponsible people are a pain in the neck and when those dogs are pit bulls, they can be literally a real pain in the neck (and other extremities).

Comment_arrow

HappieGrannie

11:07 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

NO pits are NOT the problem the problem are the owners and they should be held accountable. I used to be a paramedic and worked in hospitals and have seen people mauled by just as badly by Dobermans, Rottweilers and German Shepards. Not to mention the maulings done by St. Bernards and other large breeds. The owners need to be held accountable for their dogs. People have to learn there are consequences for not controlling their dogs. Do you know how many pits are going to have to be put down through no fault of their own other then they are Pits. Too many for my liking and if I had the ability I would take them all in and give them the life they deserve. Even the most abused Pit in Mike Vicks kennel was saved and is an AWESOME ambassador for the breed. This just proves it is not the breed but the owner that is the problem

Comment_arrow

Sean Tully

11:16 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Look, insurance companies discriminate between clients all the time. If you live in the city, your auto insurance rates will be much higher than if you live in Carroll County. Why should I pay more just because I live in the city? I drive good.

Insurance companies are starting to charge more to cover smokers. Why? I smoke about a half pack a day and I hardly inhale. Why should I pay the same rate as a five pack a day smoker?

Same goes with pit bulls.

Jack Black

1:02 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Bob Costa is a waste of a sperm cell. He's cast the deciding vote on the two highest profile issues of 2012 - gay marriage and gambling expansion - contrary to most others in his party. He must still be angling for that state job.

Reply

gangstaboo444

3:28 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

The pitbull bill is so unfair..... I have three pitbulls and they have never hurt anyone. My pitbulls are lovable and sweet. All pitbulls are not mean and nasty dogs. I have three kids and i would never bring any dogs around my kids who i thought would hurt them. I think that the owners should be responsible for the dogs actions. I dont think that one breed of dogs should be singled out. Its not fair at all. All dogs have teeth. All dogs bite. So why not ban all dogs ? I am and would always be a pitbully lover for life. Judge the deed not the breed.

Reply

gangstaboo444

3:32 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I love my pitbulls.... Blue, noah, and ace. They are all with me to serve and protect.

Reply

Joe

3:38 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Every time a pit bull hams someone the breeders of the breed should be held responsible.

Reply

John Hayden

4:05 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

During the slots debates leading up to 2008, many predicted that slots would lead to table games, additional casino sites, and further corruption of our Maryland government. It has come to pass, and it will continue to get worse.

As business columnist Steven Pearlstein explained in Suday's Washington Post, the mid-Atlantic states are now committed to a spiral of increasing competition for a limited gambling market. As the states build more casinos, the profit margins dwindle, and inevitably, many of the casinos will end up in bankruptcy. I will vote NO.

Reply

YvetteHG

4:19 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

VOTE. The most important thing to take away from all this is VOTE. Whatever your position, whatever your opinion, it means nothing but wasted bits if you don't put it into ACTION and VOTE.

Reply

Donna Macauley

5:02 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

A decade ago no one heard mention of problems with Pit Bulls....it was the Doberman Pinchers. They were the evil dogs that bit everyone. And let me just say that my friend's son was mauled by a German Shepherd five years ago...had to practically have his arm replaced. And yes, they lived in Maryland. No news on that one right? You know why? Because Maryland just follows in the footsteps of other states that don't know what the crap they are doing. Teach one, see one, do one....makes me sick.

Reply

Milt Roberts

5:11 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Omalley cries that we need this because we are so far behind neighboring states. Hey dumb**s! That's because u and your cronies blocked Ehrlich from getting slots just to keep him from succeeding. I guess that was "for the children"! What a bunch of buffoons, liars and idiots

Reply

Ronald

5:16 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I think the 21st Delegation has some explaining to do. They voted for PG County and Against AA County? Sounds like conflict of interest to me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

hawkeye

6:38 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012

@Ronald - you are so naive…21 is all Democrats and from PG County…..why wouldn't they vote for the casino? Gotta learn your politics….

Alex C

5:43 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

I actually would look forward to being able to play table games in this state, instead of having to drive up to Philadelphia or AC. But it looks like all the people commenting here are against it. Can you explain to me what your reasons are for being against it?

Reply
Comment_arrow

HappieGrannie

9:55 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Not against table games (BTW DE and WV are closer and have table games) most of us are against another casino since not all the others are even up and running

Comment_arrow

Joe

11:06 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

i am not against table games, i am against the lies we were told about the FIRST law. We were told one thing then they change the rules the taxes and the number of casinos. Why the hell should I believe anything they tell me now?

Bill Howard

10:18 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

So now that the State is taking less $$$$ from the rich guys will that money come out of Education? Promises to the children are again broken. Everyone who voted for this should put a red light on their front porch.

Reply

djp952

1:35 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Thankfully the bad reputation of Pit Bull Terriers and gambling have no correlation whatsoever. Otherwise we may begin to assume that Annapolis has no handle on reality. Phew. Bullet dodged. :-(

Reply

Ronald

8:22 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Gamin tables are not the issue. I see no problems with them. The issue is yet another Casino that will take away money from AA County.

Reply

Sean Tully

11:02 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

News from Harford County yesterday:

"Deputy shoots pit bull attacking child"

http://www.abc2news.com/dpp/news/region/harford_county/deputy-shoots-pit-bull-attacking-child

Sorry, folks, but other dogs just don't attack people as much as pits do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HappieGrannie

11:37 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

The breed is popular and a status symbol for alot of folks. This pit had been abandoned by it's owners and who knows how it was treated or if the dog was hurt or hungry or abused by local kids. So many questions and not enough answers. Again it was the OWNERS fault and not just the Pit. As for your last statement about 20 years ago it was Dobies and Rotties that were attacking folks and before that there was a rash of St. Bernard attacks. Those owners where held accountable for their dogs and that is how it should be

Joe

11:04 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Owe'Malley raises taxes on Maryland millionaires making $100,000 but LOWERS the taxes of the wealthy owners of slots parlors. That is looking out for the little guy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sean Tully

11:11 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

At least the rich casino owners are generating cash and jobs in Maryland. Many rich people these days take their capital gains and hide them overseas (ala' Mitt R.).

Comment_arrow

Joe

11:25 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Romney spends plenty in America and the democrat wining about his big house with a car elevator is an example. I bet the contractor for that elevator and the tile supplier and installer fo the tile floor are happy Mitt has money. Why do you hate those3 with more than you? do you work for a poor person?

Comment_arrow

Joe

11:26 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Oh, and Romeny is responsible for more jobs than the few casino owners here in md are.

Sean Tully

11:20 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

What I find so ironic is that many of the "good" pit bull owners posting on the Patch who are so up in arms about their dogs being singled out as potentially dangerous even though they haven't actually committed a dog crime (biting, etc.) are the very same people who have no trouble with the Arizona bill that allows police to stop and request papers from anyone they believe looks like an "illegal immigrant". I mean, really, are all brown skinned people illegal?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Donna Macauley

11:30 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

How the heck does anyone know what others post about other topics? how does anyone know they are the "same people?"

Comment_arrow

Sean Tully

11:35 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Donna, call it a hunch. Maybe I should have said "probably the very same people...". Point well taken.

Comment_arrow

Joe

11:40 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

You sure know how to conflate completely different issues.

Comment_arrow

Joe

12:14 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Maybe you should have said "those people all look alike and eat fried chicken"! There is no difference.

Dean Smith

11:24 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

This is the way I see it. The casino owners are rich, knowledgeable in their game, and are motivated and determined to expand their riches/gambling operations at the expense of Maryland taxpayers. Meanwhile, Maryland State Government is poor, weak, unknowledgeable when it comes to gambling (as well as other areas which they suppose to be good in), and are vulnerable to casino owners at the expense of Maryland taxpayers. Currently, in addition to National Harbor, at least Harford and Charles Counties want casinos because of their dire financial situations. Because there are other counties in this state whose financial situation is dire, I’m sure they are thinking about pursing casinos. I expect casino owners to not care about Maryland Taxpayers because their job is to primarily make money. However, we elected our state officials to respond to our interests/needs and they have dropped the ball, especially when it comes to gambling big time. That’s why I feel the ones who voted for this bill need to pay by getting elected out of office before all of this really gets out of hand because right now, Maryland Taxpayers are suffering in all fronts!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sean Tully

11:36 am on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Dean, how is expanding the gaming in Maryland at the expense of the taxpayers? I'd say even if gambling brings in one red cent to the state that wasn't there before, that is some kind of benefit, no?

Comment_arrow

Dean Smith

1:01 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Hey Sean!! I understand what you are stating. However, I wish it was as simple as what gambling brings in terms of money from slots. First, in focusing on the amendments (which Cordish wrote due to his complaints from potentially increased competition), casinos will be operating 24 hours/day. Since there are numerous people (including myself) who live in the Arundel Mills area, we would definitely be negatively affected by this rule. Second, I’m pretty confident whatever funds casinos generate won’t go to areas where government officials have been stating (this is based on how funds from other sources such as the lottery has been handled). Third, in addition of what I mentioned about 24/day operations, casinos I believe bring in social ills (increase crime, addictions, etc.) which haven’t been mentioned by any of the state legislatures. Fourth, while Maryland taxpayers are paying for the slot machines (which based on a Peter Franchot article in the Washington Post, we won’t get back because existing casinos are not generating enough money), casinos are getting tax break due to so-called increase competition of National Harbor while we as Maryland Tax Payers are paying more taxes. . I don’t gamble and don’t ever plan to gamble. I’m just stating that the whole process has been mishandled from the start and the blame starts at the top with O’Malley and the rest of the leaders of Maryland Government.

hawkeye

6:45 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Here are the Republicans who voted for the gaming bill: Senators: David Brinkley, Richard Colburn, George Edwards, Barry Glassman, Joseph Getty J.B. Jennings, Christopher Shank
Delegates: Wendell Beitzel,Robert Costa, Rick Impallaria, Mike McDermott, LeRoy Myers

Reply

Go Ravens

11:37 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012

And in today's news a wild pit bull took FOUR shotgun blasts and kept charging at a police officer to maul him.
A tea cup poodle isnt taking four shot gun blasts and then a shot from a 9mm to put him down if he goes nuts, You pit bull owners have more dangerous breed, step up and buy insurance if you want a pit bull, your dog bites even 1 person you should go to jail and your dog should be put down

Reply

voijonny

7:07 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012

6) Maintain (and grow) your bankroll. Keeping your bankroll intact by setting aside extra funds for shortfalls in living expenses is a wise choice. Normal bankroll fluctuations are expected, but withdrawing half of it for a vacation is taboo.

7) Advertise. Advertising is a legitimate business expense. It is an expense for professional poker players too. Sometimes drawing to an inside straight early in a session against unknowns can pay off several times over later on.

<a href="http://www.idealcasinoonline.com/casino-recensie.html">casino-recensie</a>;

Reply

voijonny

7:10 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012

Play a sufficient amount of time/hands. You must stick to a periodic number of hands or hours played to provide yourself adequate profits and allow you to grow your bankroll.

Reply

voijonny

7:10 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012

Keep records and study them. Again, online poker players have a real advantage. The amazing Poker Tracker software does this virtually automatically. Once you have the records, you can study your results and improve them. Time of day, game type, limits, number of opponents, casino…all of these things can factor into your future choices. One player might find better results while four-tabling $1/2 and chasing bonuses, while her friend might have better profits single-tabling a $5/10 game that was carefully chosen and studied.
<a href="http://www.idealcasinoonline.com/casino-recensie.html">casino-recensie</a>;

Reply

voijonny

7:14 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012

One tip worth taking note of is the choice of bingo games to play in. Simply put, when the venue is a little crowded, it is best to look for other bingo halls since the possibility of winning is quite remote as more players will have similar numbers on their cards. Lady Luck will undoubtedly play actively under such a scenario.
www.idealcasinoonline.com/casino-recensie.html

Reply

Hazzard Native

1:01 am on Monday, August 27, 2012

Hollywood Casino at Perryville, the first slots parlor opened in the state, has been open for almost 2 years now and it showed a 44% drop the first month Arundel Mills was opened. How do these Annapolis jokers suppose a huge casinos in Baltimore will impact Perryville and Arundel Mills, and how do they figure throwing National Harbor in there will impact Arundel Mills and Baltimore? The market will not be sustained. The operators are already claiming losses. WAKE THE HELL UP ANNAPOLITICIANS!

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Tim Lemke

7:40 am on Monday, August 27, 2012

A comment from gangstaboo44 has been deleted because it contained profanity in violation of Patch's Terms of Use.

Reply

Leave a comment