Time to Choose
A look at Rockville's choices for Election Day.
With the 2011 local elections in just a few days (Tuesday, Nov. 8), it's time to take a look at who's running for mayor and city council in Rockville and Gaithersburg and share a few observations. This week's column will focus on Rockville, where things have gotten a bit heated recently. Next week I'll focus on Gaithersburg.
The first and most important decision city residents can make is to show up! Local elections make a lot more difference than the paltry amount of media coverage they generate implies, so please do your part.
Don't know much about the candidates? Don’t let that deter you. There’s a wealth of information on-line, including the City of Rockville’s Official Voter Guide and a YouTube channel that features candidate presentations. Most also have websites.
Elections are always about something, but this year’s Rockville elections are striking for what they’re not about: Growth and development. All the candidates running for mayor and council are more committed to neighborhood preservation than business growth, as is often the case in Rockville, and voters seem to like it that way. From a small-business owner’s perspective, every one of the candidates could fairly be described as anti-development, pro-regulation, and in varying degrees anti-business. This, too, is pretty much in keeping with Rockville’s citizen-led, neighborhood-focused politics. Every candidate, for example, has pledged to strengthen the city's already strict "Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance," which significantly limits future growth and investment in the city. Labeling any of these candidates as "pro-development" would be a real stretch.
That being said, Rockville's strict regulatory bent occasionally needs to be tempered by a modicum of balance and common sense. Here, there are some minor differences, but the real battles seem to be over differing personalities and leadership styles.
Mayor
Current Mayor Phyllis Marcuccio has been criticized for lacking vision and for her divisive, shoot-from-the-hip leadership style. A case in point: Her recent vote against the new Choice Hotels Inc. headquarters in Rockville.
The reason she gave for voting against the deal displayed a lack of understanding of the deal itself (which provides a large net benefit to the City’s taxpayers, not the other way around). Yet, despite her opposition, she was sure to show up for groundbreaking to smile and wave to the cameras.
This alone could be reason enough to support challenger Piotr Gajewski. At least he understands that sometimes good, high-paying jobs are important to the quality of our neighborhoods. Marcuccio’s lone "nay" vote showed questionable judgment, and with the difficulties she's had working constructively with county agencies and other members of the council, help make a strong case for a new direction. The recent nasty personal attacks by some of her campaign’s supporters are beyond petty, and only reinforce the need for change.
City Council
The Gazette endorsements for city council provide good guidance for Rockville voters this year, particularly their glowing praise for Virginia Onley, who seems like the best choice. She offers a fresh perspective, seasoned leadership skills, and a commitment to restore civility and adult behavior to the council.
The rest of the Gazette endorsements (for John Hall, Mark Pierzchala, and Bridget Donnell Newton) are also pretty much on the mark, with the possible exception of Ms. Newton. While the Gazette editors credit her for having a better grasp on issues than when she was first elected, she still has some things to learn. Her vote against the Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT) alignment through King Farm, a community that was literally designed around the CCT, is a case in point. The CCT diverts thousands of people out of their cars and off local roads, connecting King Farm directly to the Shady Grove Metro and other activity centers up and down the 270 corridor.
So, to say she is concerned about "traffic" and then vote against the single most important transit facility that provides a real alternative to driving is mind-blowingly hypocritical. While I generally think highly of Bridget, she clearly missed the ball on this one. This might be reason enough for some to look elsewhere for their fourth vote for council, but with most other candidates relatively unproven, Ms. Newton may still be a good choice if she can continue to learn and grow on the job.
The Most Important Choice
Whoever you choose on Nov. 8, please GO VOTE. Turnout in past Rockville elections has been pathetic. Whenever that happens, the results tend to be dominated by a handful of self-appointed busy-bodies, rather than reflecting the genuine will of the people. We often get less than stellar leadership as a result. If you care about your community, show it: Polls are open from 7 a.m. until 8 p.m. on Nov. 8.
Tim Fahey
2:46 pm on Sunday, October 30, 2011
Richard, I must disagree with you. This vote is about integrity, which is not Mr. Gajewski's strong suit.
He has taken questionable shady deals with his campaign headquarter, taking money from notorious developers, approved the annexation of Silverwood (knowing that developers were behind him) and rubber stamps his tax and spend policies in as good for business at the expense of the Citizens. The Choice Hotel was an issue about how much money the City of Rockville was kicking in, which should have been discussed further rather than rubber stamping it in the name of good business. In my opinion, wanting to discuss the differences of opinion about the money issues shows a great deal of understand and that all issues are not always black and white.
Theresa Defino
3:10 pm on Sunday, October 30, 2011
Again with the smears and falsehoods and diversion from the mayor's abominable record.
I have not heard the mayor say there was no opportunity to discuss things "further." There was time, and she was part of the discussions and Choice Hotels and she offered no alternatives.
Thank you for your choices, Richard. We are in agreement on many.
Rocky
2:51 pm on Sunday, October 30, 2011
Mr Fahey
What are "notorious developers" ? You people have really gone over the top on this issue.
Art Stigile
7:41 pm on Sunday, October 30, 2011
Mr. Fahey, are you the Tim Fahey that's involved with the Rockville Science Center?
John Britton
10:02 pm on Sunday, October 30, 2011
Mr. Fahey's characterization about Choice ("rubber stamping it in the name of good business") is offensive and an attempt to mask Mayor Marcuccio's inability to grasp the financial details and implications: revenue from parking spaces, new tax revenue and increased local economic activity. Yet, Mayor Marcuccio's inner circle persists in labeling this a corporate give-away. This indicates a deep lack of understanding of the financial issues or a blatant distortion of the facts. Either way, it is disquieting. Mr. Fahey excuses Mayor Marcuccio's negative vote due to lack of time. Hwever, our decision was not based on one meeting. Rather, it was an iterative process that involved input from numerous participants in multi-meeting discussions. I had reviewed various financial analyses previously presented and had multiple conversations with the owner of the proposed building, the broker for the Choice Hotels team, Montgomery County's development director, the director of Rockville Economic Development, Inc., and city financial staff. To call our process a "rubber stamping" is superficial and violates the integrity of legitimate public discourse. Only one who did not adequately prepare for our meetings or who did not understand the implications of the arrangement could argue that there was not enough time within which to make a decision. In contrast, Councilmember Gajewski approached this process in a prudent and comprehensive manner.
Councilmember John Britton
Tom Miner
1:49 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
Councilmember Britton,
Than you for your well thought out reply. I appreciate the due-diligence you and "some" others put into the Choice Hotels issue. We will miss you during the next term.
Stephen Kelley
1:14 am on Monday, October 31, 2011
Mr. Fahey is correct, the vote IS about integrity. Except he is mistaken about which candidate has none.
Choice Hotels Headquarters is coming to Rockville. And if you believe Mayor Marcuccio, she is responsible for that. Simply look at her campaign materials mailed to Rockville citizens. Is she “Championing our City’s Economy” by voting against Choice Hotels’ relocation from Silver Spring to Rockville?
Choice Hotels is bringing their headquarters and approximately 400 of its employees to Rockville Town Center largely in part to the vision of Councilmembers Piotr Gajewski, John Britton and Mark Pierzchala. Mayor Marcuccio voted against bringing Choice Hotels to Rockville while Councilmember Bridget Donnell Newton abstained, effectively disagreeing with the Mayor without voting against her.
(continued....)
Stephen Kelley
1:16 am on Monday, October 31, 2011
(....continued)
Putting the debate about the subsidy given to Choice Hotels aside, the vote to bring their Headquarters and employees to Town Center provides the City with additional patrons to the fine establishments of Town Center. If Choice Hotels, or another large employer, had moved to Town Center earlier, would we have lost so many businesses in Town Center? Would Primo Italiano still be here? How about The Fractured Prune? Gifford’s Ice Cream? Greystone Grill? Mo’s Southwestern Grill? Bobby’s Crabcakes? I suspect these establishments, and their counterparts who remain in business, would have welcomed Choice Hotels to Town Center. How about the revenue, taxes and employment that will be generated by these 400 employees new to Rockville? You can talk about subsidies and what should or should not be given to employers willing to relocate to Rockville, but you can’t debate the economic impact of 400 employees working in Town Center five days per week. Providing a parking subsidy to Choice Hotels, (while arguably making a profit for the City) is pennies compared to the economic impact of these additional 400 people.
Mayor Marcuccio hasn’t “Championed our City’s Economy.” She voted against it and continues to mislead the citizens of Rockville. The vote for integrity means a vote for Piotr Gajewski.
George L. Roman
1:25 am on Monday, October 31, 2011
Two items. First, I have spoken with Piotr Gajewski about his ideas for tackling Rockville's problems and they make sense to me. To address large, capital projects (e.g. new police station; water line overhaul), Mr. Gajewski knows that in a climate of ultra-low rates, Rockville can get exceptional deals when borrowing money thanks to its excellent credit rating. At the same time, Mr. Gajewski looks to save Rockville money by eliminating support for such boondoggles as the RedGate golf course. Mr. Gajewski represented Rockville well in its recent bargaining with Choice Hotels and we can thank his working with the other council members for this achievement. Further, Mr. Gajewski has constantly endeavored to increase transparency into the workings of our city government so that Rockville residents can better participate in discussions and priority setting. I'm certain Piotr Gajewski will make an excellent mayor.
Second, Rockville voters can vote early by showing up at the City Clerk's office at City Hall on 111 Maryland Avenue between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. You don't need to wait until Tuesday Nov 8 to vote.
Jeff Hawkins
8:32 am on Monday, October 31, 2011
I agree, this would be an effective group I believe.
Gajewski, Hall, Pierzchala, Onley and Newton
Theresa Defino
8:50 am on Monday, October 31, 2011
The same EXCEPT I am supporting Tom Moore over Newton, and I undecided on the fourth council slot. Gajewski, Pierzchala, Moore, Onley...? I know many people who don't have four.
Peter Mork
7:48 am on Tuesday, November 1, 2011
I agree with Theresa: Gajewski, Pierzchala, Only and Moore.
Doug in Rockville
11:53 am on Tuesday, November 1, 2011
I also agree with Theresa and Peter. Gajewski for Mayor. Pierzchala, Onley, and Moore for Council. I also think John Hall will make a good Councilmember. I don't always agree with him, and I think he's entirely too fixated on the APFO, but I also think he's reasonable and thoughtful, and probably will work well with anyone else on the council.
Brigitta Mullican
2:42 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
Mr. Parson, much of what you wrote is a repeat from the GAZETTE. Your point of view is from the business side. Have you listened to any of the many debates? Do you give weight to the Rockville citizens?
Marcuccio has tried to get answers to questions I am concerned about as city property tax payer. We are told that 70% of the city revenues come from the residents who pay property tax above the county and state tax. Whatever the accurate percent is, the Rockville tax payers should be best represented on the Rockville City Council. The commercial base is also important, but it is the citizens who vote for the city council members.
My strongly recommend voting for Phyllis Marcuccio, John Hall, Bridget Newton and Dion Trahan. Mr. Trahan represents the future of Rockville, will bring diversity to the city council, and will bring his planning commission experience which is needed for smart growth.
In all the debates John Hall has emphasized the Rockville Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. I hope he makes sure that the Rockville APFO is not in conflict with the County's APFO because this might keep good developments from coming to Rockville. We need to increase the commercial revenue by allowing smart growth into the City.
One reason I am not supporting Mark Pierzchala and Piotr Gajewski is what I heard them say about the Redgate Golf Course over the two years. At one point they were ready to sell the property and consider a stadium. That decision changed.
Richard Parsons
5:23 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
Many Rockville residents own and run businesses, do they not? Are they not citizens too? Brigitta, we are all in this together. Without a thriving business climate, none of us have jobs, opportunities for recreational or cultural activities, and the City would have no revenue. This business vs. citizens construct is almost entirely artificial. Any smart businessperson knows that what's good for their community is also usually good for their business (and vice versa).
Temperance Blalock
5:40 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
Here's a reminder that a significant amount of property tax is paid indirectly by residents who RENT. Renters comprise over 30% of Rockville city residents, and we have just as much right to be represented on the City Council. I also speak as an employee of one of the largest private companies in Rockville, to remind you that my 300+ fellow employees contribute to the city by the money we spend here. The Council represents a diverse group of people in this city, not just people who own expensive houses in the West End.
Doug in Rockville
12:00 pm on Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Brigitta, while I understand your point of view, I just think that Piotr and Mark have a better grasp on the realities of the issues facing the city. We are in a crucial time for the future of Rockville with the pressures to the north and south--both candidates have said this. But based on the evidence provided by their comments in council meetings and in forums, there are some candidates who are more interested in trying to please whoever may be listening at the moment than actually thinking through the issues and proposals and making the right choice for Rockville. I don't think there is a single candidate who's heart isn't in the right place--even Les Francis although I could not disagree with him more. And Dion Trahan--I applaud him for being involved and hope he will stay involved but he clearly has no coherent message of who he is and why he is running, other than gimmicky catch phrases about being "your rock"....I just don't think Dion is qualified yet and he needs more time before I think he would be a steady and grounded leader on Council. He had a very solid forum performance though at the LWV, but he expressed some positions on issues that contradicted with earlier statements, as well. At any rate, the voters will choose their candidates in just one week, so we will see! Encourage your friends and neighbors to get out and vote!
LenGray
3:53 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
I wish I lived in Rockville and could vote. Peter sure would get my vote. One would think that the incumbent Mayor was running for a county office, the way she attends grand openings all over the county.
Brigitta Mullican
6:42 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
LenGray, I am very pleased that our Rockville Mayor Marcuccio has the time and commitment to attend all the events representing the Rockville people. Reaching out to all county contacts proves she is willing to work together with all. I am a Rockville voter and city tax payer. Marcuccio with a good council team will represent us tax payers well.
Ken Sandin
5:07 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
Thank you Patch for endorsing Virginia Onley and for summarizing the reasons I have been helping her campaign. And thank you for the link giving easy access to the Gazette's endorsements. Readers may have noted the Gazette's caveat on its endorsement of Ms. Onley: "...she would have some heavy lifting do to get up to speed on current city issues, such as the APFO." In my view, it is the Gazette that needs to get up to speed on the APFO. Virginia is being thoughtful in not falling in with the APFO ideologues who are flogging that poor, abused old nag. The minority report on the APFO, published by Patch on October 21, gives good reason why it needs to be examined critically, particularly by those who care about affordable housing. Virginia does care.
Doug Tallman
5:25 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
Mr. Sandin,
Just to be clear, these are Rich Parsons' opinions. Not Patch's. As a rule, we don't endorse candidates.
Jim Coyle
5:58 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
Rockville will not succeed over time without partnerships for redevelopment and development with the business sector. City contributions to new projects is a hallmark of effective business/community partnership. Ms. Marcuccio and her supporters fail to recognize this reality.
As Robert McCartney, Washinton Post, said at the recent Economic Summit, Rockville needs to understand what kind of community it wants to be in the future and work with the business community to make that happen.
With the myopia of Ms. Marcuccio and her supporters we will not achieve this goal.
Theresa Defino
6:16 pm on Monday, October 31, 2011
I am a citizen, a tax-payer, a resident, a homeowner. I posted my picks. Do those not count? And as far as the Gazette and Mr. Parsons being together--as the saying goes, GMTA.
I also abhor the divisions and the labeling. Developer, lawyer, renter--and now business owner?--all said in the same breath as if they're child molesters and drug dealers. This election has seen some ugly tactics used to obscure indefensible voting records. I trust the voters will not fall for it.
Brigitta Mullican
12:18 pm on Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Doug, I would like to have an off-line conversation with you. Please send me your email address. Brigitta Mullican coburg1@verizon.net
Tim Fahey
10:53 am on Sunday, November 6, 2011
I'm glad Mr. Kelly has reminded me that this election is about integrity. Your team of apologists all listed in this post, including the Gazette, have some explaining to do when it comes down to calling something a smear campaign, when Mr. Gajewski attacked people who questioned his finances, and then lied about his campaign finances. See post below. He took money from campaign contributors then voting in support support their legislation. There is a name for that kind of action. Asking someone to explain something doesn't make it a smear campaign. The citizens and the mayor and council have the right to question something when it goes over budget. That's called accountability. You and your apologists wouldn't allow this type of lack of moral values and integrity in your own companies, then why would permit kind of person to represent the city and bring real shame to our city's good name. Values dictate behavior. Organizational values start at the top. Hopefully, the next group of leaders elected on Tuesday will work together instead of working against one another for personal gain.
http://rockville.patch.com/articles/new-campaign-fund-reports-show-contributors-benefitted-from-candidate-s-votes#comment_1797970