By Christopher Neely
| Capital News Service
WASHINTON - Maryland is a state with a serious marijuana
arrest problem, according to the FBI’s 2011 annual Uniform Crime Report.
With 22,043 arrests for marijuana possession producing an
arrest rate of 378 people per 100,000, Maryland ranked among the top five in
marijuana possession arrests according to the most recent data available. This
is not new for the Free State.
Since 2007, Maryland has been in the top five states in
marijuana possession arrest rate.
“I have no idea why these numbers are so high,” said state
Sen. Bobby Zirkin, D-Baltimore County, who is an advocate for marijuana
decriminalization in Maryland. “The numbers are shocking and staggering.”
Experts say the numbers are in part the result of the war on
drugs being focused on petty marijuana possession arrests starting in the
1990s. Some also attribute much of the increase to then-Baltimore Mayor and now
Gov. Martin O’Malley, who helped introduce both statistics driven policing and
zero tolerance policies to the state.
Because of issues with reporting statistics to the FBI, it
cannot be said for sure where in the top five Maryland ranks. While most states
and cities participate, reporting crime statistics is voluntary, and some
places choose not to report.
A redirection of the
“War on Drugs”
The “War on Drugs” has gone in many directions since its
official introduction by President Richard Nixon in 1971.
Domestically, what initially was a general focus on
marijuana in the 1970s, turned into removing users of crack cocaine from the
streets during the 1980s.
In the 1990s, the direction shifted back toward low-level marijuana possession arrests. According to FBI data, arrest numbers spiked across the country, rising from 213,453 in 1990, to 462,846 by 1999, an increase of more than 116 percent.
This increase in arrests was especially apparent in
Maryland. From 1990-1999, the same FBI data show the number of marijuana
possession arrests in Maryland rose from 6,278 to 16,184, an increase of more
than 157 percent.
The acceleration of statewide arrest numbers began to
plateau in the new century. But not in Baltimore.
The 2000s, O’Malley
and the rise of Compstat
From 2000-2007, Maryland’s overall marijuana possession
arrest rate rose by 4,916 arrests per year, or 28 percent statewide.
During the same time period, Baltimore’s marijuana arrest
rate surged by 3,686 arrests per year - more than 155 percent.
O’Malley was elected Baltimore mayor in 1999 in a landslide
victory, replacing former Mayor Kurt Schmoke.
O’Malley ran on an anti-crime platform, advocating for “zero
tolerance” policing. As a Baltimore city councilmen, O’Malley studied the drop
in crime in New York City after “zero tolerance” was implemented and pushed for
Baltimore to adopt the same policy.
“Zero tolerance” is a policing strategy that increases the
focus on minor, non-violent offenses. The idea is based on the “broken windows”
theory, which says if minor offenses are not met with strict enforcement,
overall crime will increase.
“Upon taking office, Baltimore averaged 300-plus murders annually and the city was rapidly losing ground in the war on drugs on its street corners,” O’Malley’s office said in an emailed statement in response to questions from Capital News Service.
O’Malley’s first duty as mayor was to find a new police commissioner.
In an attempt to mirror New York City’s crime reduction,
O’Malley hired Ed Norris, a 20-year veteran of the New York City Police
Phyllis McDonald, an associate professor in the Division of
Public Safety Leadership at Johns Hopkins University, and author of Managing
Police Operations: Implementing the New York Crime Control Model -- CompStat,
said part of the reason O’Malley brought Norris in was to set up a CompStat
system for Baltimore.
This new statistics-driven system was based on police
department accountability and created a mapping system of crime type and
Norris lasted until 2002 as police commissioner. O’Malley,
committed to the New York technique of crime-fighting, replaced Norris with
former NYPD Deputy Chief Kevin Clark. Clark had been on the department’s
Organized Crime Control Bureau’s Narcotics Division.
Maj. Neill Franklin, a retired officer of both the Baltimore
Police Department and Maryland State Police Department, said Clark felt
strongly about curbing drugs on the street.
“I remember him (Clark) saying that our main crime problem
in the streets was drugs and that we were going to hit that hard and make more
drug-related arrests,” Franklin said.
Franklin said Clark created the “Organized Crime Division”
which was basically a narcotics team of more than 300 officers.
“In addition to personnel, he strengthened the unit with
other resources to go out and target drug dealers and drug users throughout the
city,” Franklin said.
Franklin is now executive director of Law Enforcement
Against Prohibition, a nonprofit organization of current and former law
enforcement and criminal justice workers who advocate for changes in current
U.S. drug policies. He also worked as head of training at the Baltimore Police
Department and as regional commander for the Bureau of Drugs and Criminal
Enforcement in both the Baltimore and Maryland State Police departments.
O’Malley and his new New York City style of crime-fighting
watched as Baltimore alone accounted for 75 percent of the increase in the
marijuana arrest rate in Maryland.
“There is undoubtedly a correlation between higher petty
marijuana possession arrest rates and the CompStat and “zero tolerance”
policies brought in by O’Malley,” Franklin said.
O’Malley’s office argues the policies were necessary because
of the level of crime at the time.
“Then-Mayor O'Malley took steps he felt were necessary to
ensure the safety and security of one of the most crime-ridden cities in the
nation,” O’Malley’s office said in an emailed statement.
The Baltimore Police Department dropped “zero tolerance” in
2007, the year O’Malley left for state office, but “stop and frisk” techniques
still live on.
“Stop and frisk” is a controversial technique that allows
officers to stop people at will under suspicion that they may be carrying a
Currently, Franklin said there is a stronger focus on
getting guns off the street. But even if an officer’s main focus is searching a
person for weapons, suspicion of marijuana possession is a great tool for law
enforcement to initiate a “stop and frisk” on a person walking the streets.
However, with society shifting to a more marijuana-tolerant
mentality, “stop and frisk” could become harder to initiate for police.
“It’s a very lively conversation in close police circles,”
Franklin said. “They’re saying, ‘How are we going to search people at will if
we lose marijuana (to legalization)?’”
Potential changes in
Times are changing. States like Washington and Colorado have
legalized recreational use of the drug, and more states are jumping on the
Maryland looked like it was starting to open up when the
state passed a medical marijuana bill last year, however, the final bill was
relatively conservative, as it only created a commission to oversee medical
marijuana programs at academic medical research centers that choose to
But according to a recent poll conducted by
Democratic-affiliated Public Policy Polling, 68 percent of Marylanders support
decriminalization. Fifty-three percent support legalization similar to Colorado
Decriminalization bills are being reintroduced in Maryland
by Sen. Zirkin and Sen. Allan Kittleman, R-Howard, after failing to come to a
vote in the House last year. In addition, Senate President Thomas V. “Mike”
Miller Jr. told The Washington Post in an interview recently that he favors
Gubernatorial candidate Delegate Heather Mizeur,
D-Montgomery County, also favors legalizing, regulating and taxing marijuana.
But O’Malley said Wednesday on the “Annapolis
Summit” radio broadcast of the Marc Steiner show that he is against
“I’m not much in favor of it … because I’ve seen what drug
addiction has done to the people of our state,” O’Malley said during the show.
“I also know that this drug, and it’s use — it’s abuse — can be a gateway to
even more harmful behavior.”
Franklin said that without changes from the top, policing
culture is not likely to change.
“Law enforcement and officers get in the groove of doing something,” Franklin said. “And if society begins to make adjustments, law enforcement tends to be the last to make that change.
“Change needs to come from the top.”